home / Forums / Bodybuilding / Training / *BRO-SPLIT VS SCIENCE*
This topic contains 0 replies, has 1 voice, and was last updated by Zillagreybeard 3 years, 2 months ago.
*BRO-SPLIT VS SCIENCE*
Discussion in 'Training' started by Zillagreybeard, Aug 26, 2021.You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Recent forum posts:
Baseball9Unblocked4 replied 3 weeks, 6 days ago
Sciroxx replied 1 month ago
steven johns726 replied 1 month ago
*BRO-SPLIT VS SCIENCE*
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
Alright, I figured it’s been a little bit since I’ve posted split content so what a better day to share this awesome posts that I agree with by Oakley O’Day!
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
So let me open up with a disclaimer that the bro-split is not necessarily bad. I still remember my old log books from tracked bro splits that I have til this day. For the most part I fell into the same trap that most everyday fitness enthusiast find in magazines by people that were on super creatine (aka enhancers etc) and were growing mad with crazy results from this type of style of workout.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
BUT as naturals, time and time again studies have shown that in order to benefit efficiently for muscle growth that hitting the muscle groups multiple times a week is the most efficient way of putting on muscle.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
What you have here is a 6 day split where each muscle group is getting hit multiple times a week. For most this is a lot of volume so keep that in mind as you could use other splits to hit the muscle groups frequently only in less days.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
This example has abs/core getting hit on a separate day as many of you know that I only hit abs directly twice a week on lower days with hanging leg raises but feel free to add any core or ab exercises you like to these types of programs.